30-Second Takeaway
- mHealth or remotely delivered exercise is feasible and safe across diverse post-acute populations.
- Home-based programs can improve aerobic fitness in children and strength/balance signals in adults, but QoL gains are inconsistent.
Week ending May 23, 2026
Remote and home-based rehabilitation: recent RCTs and implementation evidence
mHealth-supported exercise reverses frailty after autologous transplant
In multiple myeloma survivors within 180 days post-autologous transplant, a 16-week mHealth-supported program reduced Fried frailty scores more than usual care (P<.001). The intervention used 8 weeks supervised tele-exercise (3×/week, 50 minutes) then 8 weeks home exercise with high adherence (85% supervised, 78% unsupervised). Chair-stand time improved with sustained benefit; other SPPB components and grip strength trended favorably but were not uniformly significant. No serious adverse events were reported, supporting feasibility and safety in this early posttransplant prefrail/frail population.
Avatar-guided home exercise feasible in older sepsis survivors
In a pilot RCT of older sepsis survivors (EX n=10, CO n=11), a 12-week avatar-guided home program showed high retention (95%) and moderate adherence (76%). The exercise group trended toward improved lower-extremity strength (30SSTS +1.14 reps, d=0.39) and balance (4SBT +5.07 s, d=1.07) versus controls. Thirty-four adverse events occurred but serious events were judged unrelated to the intervention, supporting short-term safety. Findings are preliminary and require adequately powered trials to confirm clinical efficacy.
Home-based exercise improves aerobic capacity in children
Systematic review and meta-analysis of 81 studies (2923 children) found home-based exercise increased aerobic capacity versus controls (SMD 0.53; p<0.0001). No consistent benefits were observed for functional capacity or quality of life compared with controls, and muscle-strength data were insufficient for meta-analysis. Adherence was generally high (>80% in many studies) and adverse events were uncommon, but reporting quality and risk of bias limit certainty.
References
Numbered in order of appearance. Click any reference to view details.
Additional Reads
Optional additional studies from this edition.