30-Second Takeaway
- Use z-score thresholds for spirometry interpretation; they reclassify many to lesser severity and align with lower clinical risk.
- Higher baseline FVC predicts longer survival independent of FEV1/FVC and region.
Week ending June 13, 2026
Five recent studies with direct implications for spirometry interpretation, lung-function prognostication, trial generalisability, primary-care hypoxaemia detection, and PCCM service expansion.
Z-scores reduce measured spirometric severity and align with lower clinical risk.
Switching from percent-predicted cutoffs to z-score thresholds reclassified many adults to a lesser severity, with no one moved to higher severity. In NHANES (n=14,863) and a COPD cohort (n=14,238), those reclassified to lesser severity had lower odds of dyspnea and COPD exacerbation. Reclassification correlated with lower mortality risk (NHANES HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.71–0.93). These results support adopting z-score thresholds for adult spirometry interpretation, noting applicability to routine clinical reporting.
Higher baseline FVC predicts substantially lower mortality across multinational sites.
In 9,927 BOLD participants (mean follow-up 8.7 years), higher baseline post-bronchodilator FVC was inversely associated with mortality. Each SD higher baseline FVC was linked to a 44% lower mortality in men and 28% lower in women after mutual adjustment for FEV1/FVC. FEV1/FVC showed smaller and less consistent associations when adjusted for FVC. Regional lung-function differences did not explain prognostic associations, arguing against regional re-scaling when assessing prognosis.
Women remain underrepresented in lung cancer RCTs, with impacts on adverse-event reporting.
Systematic review of 636 lung cancer RCTs (265,989 participants) found pooled enrolment incidence disparity of -3.17%, indicating female underrepresentation. Underrepresentation was greater in very high-HDI regions and in selected subgroups like younger or predominantly Caucasian cohorts. Trial-level differences in female enrolment correlated with differences in reported adverse-event incidence across settings. These patterns limit direct generalisability of trial safety and possibly efficacy data to women.
References
Numbered in order of appearance. Click any reference to view details.
Additional Reads
Optional additional studies from this edition.