Skip to main content
Skip to main content
Back to Grand Rounds
Grand RoundsWeekly Evidence Brief

Trauma Surgery

Edition

30-Second Takeaway

  • High-fidelity ERP delivery (≥13 of 21 elements) shortens LOS and reduces complications in pediatric elective GI surgery.
  • Self-pay insurance independently predicts higher in-hospital mortality in pediatric trauma.

Week ending May 16, 2026

Five recent papers relevant to pediatric and trauma surgical care: ERPs, disparities, urologic trauma guidance, tCVST prognostication, and pressure-injury prevention

Enhanced recovery with high adherence shortens LOS and lowers complications in pediatric GI surgery

JAMA SURGERYMay 13, 2026

In this stepped-wedge trial of 597 patients (age 10–18) across 18 US sites, overall LOS did not differ by study phase. Patients receiving ≥13 of the 21 ERP elements had shorter median LOS (−1.14 days) and fewer complications (aOR 0.48). Patient-level adherence increased with implementation, and integration into order sets correlated with fidelity. When implementing pediatric ERPs, aim for high element-level fidelity and use toolkits and feedback to sustain adherence.

Self-pay status independently predicts higher in-hospital mortality after pediatric traumatic injury

JOURNAL OF RACIAL AND ETHNIC HEALTH DISPARITIESMay 12, 2026

In 148,019 pediatric trauma patients (ISS >9), overall mortality was 4.4%, higher in Non-Hispanic Black children (6.6%) and self-pay patients (7.5%). Adjusted models found self-pay status associated with increased mortality versus Medicaid (OR 1.23), with Non-Hispanic Black race also showing a smaller adjusted effect. Firearm-related injury carried the highest mortality risk (OR 4.18). Consider insurance status when risk-stratifying and target system-level interventions to reduce access-related mortality differences.

AUA and EAU urologic trauma guidelines largely align but differ in specificity and follow-up

EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUSMay 9, 2026

Both guidelines favor nonoperative management for hemodynamically stable urologic trauma and recommend contrast-enhanced imaging for renal injury. AUA allows intervention based on hematoma size, whereas EAU emphasizes angioembolization and structured follow-up including blood pressure monitoring. EAU provides more detail on iatrogenic injuries and post-treatment imaging; AUA gives more diagnostic protocols for ureteral trauma. Apply guideline differences to local resources and patient needs, and recognise recommendations often rest on low-quality evidence.

References

Numbered in order of appearance. Click any reference to view details.

Additional Reads

Optional additional studies from this edition.

Edition context

Clinical signal

  • Monitor and report ERP element-level adherence when implementing pediatric ERPs.
  • Discuss insurance-related risk with families and advocate for resource-targeted care in self-pay patients.
  • Use guideline differences (AUA vs EAU) to individualize urologic trauma decisions, especially follow-up and angioembolization thresholds.